The wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postgenderism#PostgenderismThe idea, basically and as I understand it, is put forth that given future technology it will be possible and desirable that gender will be optional for all people; either different sexes/genders would be erased from the species entirely or that an individual would be able to freely choose and change their sex/gender. Some thoughts:
1.
An important and influential work in this regard was socialist feminist Donna Haraway's essay, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York; Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181. In this work, Haraway is intepreted as arguing that women would only be freed from their biological restraints when their reproductive obligations were dispensed with. In other words, women will only achieve true liberation once they become postbiological organisms, or postgendered. However, Haraway has publicly stated that her use of the word "post-gender" has been grossly misinterpreted. Firstly, this interpretation smacks of greater hate of female-ness than any kind of currently existing misogyny. Women can only be considered equal when they stop being women? Uh. Hmm. I'd like to read this book, see if some other interpretation presents itself, but I mean. Anyone who wants to say that women and womanhood as a concept are somehow inherently lesser, ugly, to be destroyed and avoided is just... I'm glad to be a woman, I enjoy it, I think femininity has qualities that are better and more appealing than masculinity for a lot of things, and that losing either would be really really sad and diminishing to the human experience. I like androgyny as a concept, but not as the only allowed or the only valued option.
2.
Given the potential for advanced assistive reproductive options, postgenderists believe that sex for reproductive purposes will eventually either become entirely unnecessary or that all human beings will have the ability, if they so choose, to both carry a pregnancy to term and father a child, placing the entire need for gender distinctions and gender differences into question. On the other hand, keeping our current(or similar) concepts of masculinity and femininity, along with easily mutable sex-assignment presents some interesting problems; when anyone can choose to be either female or male at any time, will hierarchical social systems just find another criteria on which to rank people? Will, as in many cultures with homosexual peoples, people be stigmatized based on which role they choose, or be expected to take different roles at different times of their lives?
3.
"It is also thought that posthuman space will be more virtual than real. Individuals may consist of uploaded minds living as data patterns on supercomputers or users engaged in completely immersive virtual realities. Postgenderists contend that these types of existences are not gender-specific thus allowing individuals to morph their virtual appearances and sexuality at will."Quoted for most excellent coolness. <3 We've all seen programs like second-life, or virtual woman, where people interact through customizable avatars with both other avatars and with programs exhibiting some level of artificial intelligence. Some of you might have seen the
headtracking for VR display video involving pretty ridiculously awesome graphics effects. Given these kinds of technologies--advancing all the time and gaining rapidly in availability and popularity--this is not as far off as some of the other options. This is more like the second option, but involves less attachment to physical realities and more to theoretical constructions of gender and self.
Some Questions:1. If it were possible to do away with gender as a concept, would you want to? If so, would you want the resulting humans to be perfectly androgynous, or more aligned to the masculine, or to the feminine?
2. If it were possible to freely and frequently change physical sex, would you want to? Would you be comfortable with a partner/partners who could/did?
3. If you could participate in a fully realistic virtual social environment wherein gender was mutable and not linked to physicality, would you want to? Would you be comfortable with a partner/partners in such a construct?